Data Rituals in Intimate Infrastructures: Crip Time and the Disabled Cyborg Body as an Epistemic Site of Feminist Science

Laura Forlano

Abstract


While much feminist STS has focused on science and laboratories as sites of critical engagement, feminism and feminist theory has introduced alternative sites of knowledge production and engagement. This essay draws on new materialism and feminist theories of nature, embodiment and technology in order to analyze the disabled cyborg body as an epistemic site of feminist science. In particular, I analyze my own experience of adopting and using networked technologies—specifically, an insulin pump and glucose monitor--to manage Type 1 diabetes and the kinds of scientific practices that I engage in on a daily basis. These technologies and practices deserve attention in terms of what they can teach us about common discourses around science, innovation and infrastructure and, ultimately, about ourselves. 


Keywords


wireless technology; medical devices; quantified self; internet of things; big data; cyborg anthropology

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Agre, Philip. (1997). Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 131-157.

Archer, Bruce. (1995). The nature of research. Co-Design Journal, 2(11), 6-13.

Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Hansen, L. K. . (2015). Immodest proposals: Research through design and knowledge. Paper presented at the CHI’15: World Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Korea.

Braidotti, Rosi. (2013). The Posthuman. Boston: Polity.

Carey, James W. (1988). Communication As Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New York: Unwin Hyman, Inc.

Crenshaw, Kimberle. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford law review, 1241-1299.

Dow Schüll, Natasha. (2016a). Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties.

Dow Schüll, Natasha. (2016b). Sensor technology and the time-series self. continent., 5(1), 24-29.

Haraway, Donna J. (1991a). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

Haraway, Donna Jeanne. (1991b). A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149-181). New York: Routledge.

Haraway, Donna Jeanne. (1994). A game of cat's cradle: science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations, 2(1), 59-71.

Howard, Philip N. (2015). Pax Technica: How the Internet of things may set us free or lock us up: Yale University Press.

Jackson, Steven J. (2014). Rethinking Repair. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski & K. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lave, Jean, & Wenger, Etienne. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Lury, Celia, & Wakeford, Nina. (2012). Inventive Methods: The happening of the social. New York: Routledge.

Neff, Gina, & Nafus, Dawn. (2016). The Self-Tracking: MIT Press.

Neustaedter, Carman, & Sengers, Phoebe. (2012).

Autobiographical design in HCI research: designing and learning through use-it-yourself. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference.

Pollock, Anne, & Subramaniam, Banu. (2016). Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences. Science, Technology & Human Values. doi: 10.1177/0162243916657879

Rosner, Daniela K, & Ames, Morgan. (2014). Designing for repair?: infrastructures and materialities of breakdown. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing.

Sanders, Liz, & Stappers, Pieter Jan. (2012). Convivial design toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design: BIS.

Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

Sengers, Phoebe. (2006). Autobiographical design. Paper presented at the CHI 2006 Workshop on Theory and Method for Experience-Centred Design.

Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377.

Star, Susan Leigh. (1990). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 26-56.

Suchman, Lucy. (2007a). Agencies in technology design: Feminist reconfigurations. Unpublished manuscript.

Suchman, Lucy. (2007b). Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wajcman, Judy. (2000). Reflections on gender and technology studies: in what state is the art? Social Studies of Science, 30(3), 447-464.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v3i2.130

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Laura Forlano

--

ISSN 2380-3312 | If you have questions about the site, including access difficulties due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please email editor at catalystjournal.org