Open Ethnographic Archiving as Feminist, Decolonizing Practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dubbed Silicon Savannah, Nairobi has become a hot spot of tech development that promises to “save Africa.” Qualitative research—carried out by a tangle of private, academic, and non-profit organizations—is part of the work, promising to reveal how people in Kenya are building and benefiting from a dazzling array of digital products. Amidst the enthusiasm, longstanding problems with ways in which research data in Nairobi is conceived, collected, and shared are easily glossed over. This article advances thinking about the politics of qualitative data, unraveling normative concepts like ethics and transparency by both examining existing data practices and modeling alternatives. I describe the sociotechnical infrastructure underlying the ethnographic project, detailing tactics for deploying an instance of open source software—the Platform for Experimental, Collaborative Ethnography (PECE)—to draw research interlocutors into collaborative effort to understand and build decolonized qualitative data infrastructures. Through such processes I learned that collaborating on data not only refreshes the social contract of qualitative work; it can also enhance its robustness and validity. I advise scholars to better document our own knowing practices in order to attend to the inevitability of margins created through all data practices, including our own
Article Details
Authors and artists who publish with Catalyst agree to the following terms:
(a) The author(s) or artist(s) retain the copyright and rights to all uses of their work, including reuse for commercial purposes.
(b) The author(s) or artist(s) grant Catalyst a license to publish their work in Catalyst.
(c) The author(s) or artist(s) grant the right for this work to be distributed for scholarly and educational purposes and not for commercial purposes. Scholarly and educational use is free. Other uses depend on the written permission of the author or artist.
(d) In cases of first publication, the author will mention Catalyst as a source whenever the author later republishes the article on other platforms.
References
Amrute, S., & Murillo, L. F. (2018, June). CFP—Computing in/from the South | Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience. Retrieved January 28, 2019, from Catalyst website: https://catalystjournal.org/index.php/catalyst/announcement/view/584
Arondekar, A. (2009). For the Record: On Sexuality and the Colonial Archive in India (First Edition). Retrieved from http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=5ef44c2b9a7d756d5efeea0e35363110
Bateson, G. (1972). A Theory of Play and Fantasy. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology (pp. 150–166). New York: Ballantine Books.
Behar, R. (1997). The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks Your Heart. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=ijyAm4HB_NQC
Beresford, A. (2016). Africa rising? Review of African Political Economy, 43(147), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2016.1149369
Biruk, C. (2018). Cooking data: Culture and politics in an African research world. Durham: Duke University Press.
Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634
Bowker, G. C. (2008). Memory practices in the sciences (1. paperback ed). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
Bowker, G. C. (2014). 4. All Together Now: Synchronization, Speed, and the Failure of Narrativity. History and Theory, 53(4), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10731
Broom, A., Cheshire, L., & Emmison, M. (2009). Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing. Sociology, 43(6), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509345704
Chatterjee, P., & Maira, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Imperial University: Academic repression and scholarly dissent. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chen, G., & Posada, A. (2018). Inequality in Knowledge Production: The Integration of Academic Infrastructure by Big Publishers. 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing. Presented at the 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.30
Christen, K. (2011). Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist, 74(1), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
Christen, K. (2012). Does Information Really Want to be Free? Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2870–2893.
Christen, K. (2015). Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the “s” Matters. Journal of Western Archives, 6(1). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/vol6/iss1/3
Clark, T. (2008). `We’re Over-Researched Here!’: Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements. Sociology, 42(5), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094573
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2012). Theory from the South: Or, how Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa. Anthropological Forum, 22(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.694169
Cornwall, A. (2007). Buzzwords and Fuzzwords: Deconstructing Development Discourse. Development in Practice, 17(4/5), 471–484.
Crane, J. T. (2013). Scrambling for Africa: AIDS, Expertise, and the Rise of American Global Health Science. Retrieved from http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=ba8ecf1c10908522f39e0712b010f6bd
Crewe, E., & Harrison, E. (1998). Whose development?: An ethnography of aid. London ; New York : New York: Zed Books ; Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin’s Press.
Currie, M. E., & Paris, B. S. (2018). Back-ups for the future: Archival practices for data activism. Archives and Manuscripts, 46(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1468273
Davies, T., Walker, S., Rubinstein, M., & Perini, F. (Eds.). (2019). The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons. Cape Town and Ottawa: African Minds and International Development Research Centre.
de Lauretis, T. (1990). Eccentric Subjects: Feminist Theory and Historical Consciousness. Feminist Studies, 16(1), 115–150.
Deloria, V. (1988). Custer died for your sins: An Indian manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Derrida, J. (1998). Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression (First edition; E. Prenowitz, Trans.). S.l.: University of Chicago Press.
Elinoff, E. (2017). Towards an Ethnography Commons. Commoning Ethnography, 1(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.26686/ce.v1i1.4126
Estalella, A., & Criado, T. S. (Eds.). (2018). Experimental collaborations: Ethnography through fieldwork devices. New York: Berghahn Books.
Ferguson, R. A. (2012). The reorder of things: The university and its pedagogies of minority difference. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
Fortun, K. (2012). ETHNOGRAPHY IN LATE INDUSTRIALISM. Cultural Anthropology, 27(3), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01153.x
Fortun, M., Fortun, K., & Marcus, G. E. (2017). Computers in/and Anthropology: The Poetics and Politics of Digitization. In The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974-11
Hall, S. (2001). Constituting an archive. Third Text, 15(54), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820108576903
Harrison, F. V. (Ed.). (1991). Decolonizing anthropology: Moving further toward an anthropology for liberation. Washington, D.C: Association of Black Anthropologists : American Anthropological Association.
Hodžić, S. (2017). The twilight of cutting: African activism and life after NGOs. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
Hountondji, P. (1990). Scientific Dependence in Africa Today. Research in African Literatures, 21(3), 5–15.
Irani, L. (2018). “Design Thinking”: Defending Silicon Valley at the Apex of Global Labor Hierarchies | Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v4i1.29638
Isaacman, A. F., Lalu, P., & Nygren, T. I. (2005). Digitization, History, and the Making of a Postcolonial Archive of Southern African Liberation Struggles: The Aluka Project. Africa Today, 52(2), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/at.2006.0009
Kasdogan, D. (2018, April 10). The Economization of Life – Interview with Michelle Murphy*. Retrieved January 27, 2019, from IstanbuLab website: https://stsistanbul.org/2018/04/11/the-economization-of-life-michelle-murphy/
Kothari, U. (2005). Authority and expertise: The professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent. Antipode, 37(3), 425–446.
Kukutai, T., Taylor, J., Australian National University, & Centre for Aboriginal EconomicPolicy Research. (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Retrieved from http://proxy.cm.umoncton.ca/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt1q1crgf
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Liboiron, M., Zahara, A., & Schoot, I. (2018). Community Peer Review: A Method to Bring Consent and Self-Determination into the Sciences. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0104.v1
Macharia, K. (2015). Archive and method in Queer African Studies. Agenda, 29(1), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2015.1010294
Mahler, A. G. (2017). Global South [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780190221911-0055
Mannheimer, S., Pienta, A., Kirilova, D., Elman, C., & Wutich, A. (2018). Qualitative Data Sharing: Data Repositories and Academic Libraries as Key Partners in Addressing Challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764218784991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784991
Marchant, E. (2018). INSPIRING, LEGITIMIZING, RESTRICTING & RESISTING THE MANY ROLES OF NARRATIVES AND STORYTELLING AMONG KENYA’S TECHNOLOGY INNOVATORS. University of Pennsylvania.
Marcus, G. (2000). Para-Sites. Retrieved from http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo3628789.html
Mbembe, A. (2015, May 11). Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive. Retrieved from https://africaisacountry.atavist.com/decolonizing-knowledge-and-the-question-of-the-archive
Moore, N. (2007). (Re)Using Qualitative Data? Sociological Research Online, 12(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1496
Murillo, L. F. R. (2018). What Does “Open Data” Mean for Ethnographic Research?: Multimodal Anthropologies. American Anthropologist, 120(3), 577–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13088
Murphy, M. (2017). The Economization of Life. Retrieved from www.dukeupress.edu/the-economization-of-life
Mutuku, L., & Mahihu, C. (2014). Open Data in Developing Countries: Understanding the Impacts of Kenya Open Data Applications and Services. Nairobi, Kenya: iHub Research.
Nothias, T. (2014). ‘Rising’, ‘hopeful’, ‘new’: Visualizing Africa in the age of globalization. Visual Communication, 13(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214530063
AUTHOR LAST NAME, A. (2019a). Collaboration Agreement. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2550977
AUTHOR LAST NAME, A. (2019b). Data Circulation Form. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2551093
Pels, P., Boog, I., Florusbosch, J. H., Kripe, Z., Minter, T., Postma, M., … Richards‐Rissetto, H. (2018). Data management in anthropology: The next phase in ethics governance? Social Anthropology, 26(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12526
Pierre, J. (2013). The predicament of blackness: Postcolonial Ghana and the politics of race. Chicago ; London: The University of Chicago Press.
Pisani, E., Aaby, P., Breugelmans, J. G., Carr, D., Groves, T., Helinski, M., … Guerin, P. J. (2016). Beyond open data: Realising the health benefits of sharing data. BMJ, 355, i5295. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5295
Pisani, E., & AbouZahr, C. (2010). Sharing health data: Good intentions are not enough. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(6), 462–466. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.09.074393
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., & Edwards, P. N. (2018). Re-integrating scholarly infrastructure: The ambiguous role of data sharing platforms. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 2053951718756683. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756683
Poggiali, L. (2016). Seeing (from) Digital Peripheries: Technology and Transparency in Kenya’s Silicon Savannah. Cultural Anthropology, 31(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.3.07
Poirier, L. (2017). Devious Design: Digital Infrastructure Challenges for Experimental Ethnography. Design Issues, 33(2), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00440
Poirier, L., DiFranzo, D., & Gloria, M. J. K. (2014). Light structure in the Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography. Presented at the Web Science 2014 Workshop Interdisciplinary Coups to Calamities.
Reyes, V. (2017). Three models of transparency in ethnographic research: Naming places, naming people, and sharing data. Ethnography, 1466138117733754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138117733754
Rooks, N. M. (2006). White money/Black power: The surprising history of African American studies and the crisis of race in higher education. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3117983
Sanjek, R., & Tratner, S. W. (Eds.). (2015). eFieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology in the Digital World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Scott, J. W. (1991). The Evidence of Experience. Critical Inquiry, 17(4), 773–797.
Silverman, S., Parezo, N. J., & Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research (Eds.). (1992). Preserving the anthropological record. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.
Simpson, C. (Ed.). (1998). Universities and empire: Money and politics in the social sciences during the Cold War. New York: New Press.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
Spivak, G. C. (2012). An aesthetic education in the era of globalization (First Harvard University Press paperback edition). Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England: Harvard University Press.
Stoler, A. L. (2009). Along the archival grain: Epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Takhmazyan, T., & Wang, S. (2018). Artist Michelle Dizon explores identity through COLA installation. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from HS Insider website: https://highschool.latimes.com/arcadia-high-school/artist-michelle-dizon-explores-identity-through-cola-installation/
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., … Frame, M. (2011). Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Tilley, H. (2011). Africa as a living laboratory: Empire, development, and the problem of scientific knowledge, 1870-1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Traynor, C., & Foster, L. (2017, October 7). Principles and practice in open science: Addressing power and inequality through “situated openness.” Retrieved January 28, 2019, from Natural Justice website: https://naturaljustice.org/principles-practice-open-science-addressing-power-inequality-situated-openness/
Tuck, E., & Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. (2013). Curriculum, Replacement, and Settler Futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(1). Retrieved from http://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/411
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1).
Turin, M. (2011). Born Archival: The Ebb and Flow of Digital Documents from the Field. History and Anthropology, 22(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2011.626776
Vega, P. (2018, December 10). Open Insights: An interview with Leslie Chan. Retrieved January 28, 2019, from Open Library of Humanities website: https://www.openlibhums.org/news/314/
Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.